Grigoriy Dobryakov

Engineering series

Engineering breakdowns

How it actually works

One format throughout: real engineering task → methodology → working artifact (repo, video) → honest breakdown of where it fails. Mechanics you can repeat, and the boundary where they stop working.

Series signature

«Where it breaks» is a required section in every breakdown. An artifact without honest failure modes is a demo, not engineering.

03

Retrieval layer for book-as-context

Vector-only misses terms absent from the embedding. A retrieval layer with three modes for agentive book-as-context: the agent sees where each chunk came from — and can explain why it picked it.

CTO Head of AI Architect Tech Lead
Read breakdown →
04 GitHub · ★8 / 4 forks

Async MCP server with job queue

A naive MCP server blocks on long operations. Async job queue: submit → poll, and 404-after-completion as a deliberate stateless trade-off.

CTO Head of AI Architect Tech Lead
Read breakdown →
07 GitHub · ★2

Cursor rules as governance

When 10 people vibe-code, architectural standards drift. Governance introduced not through a lecture, but as a guardrail directly in the toolchain.

CTO Head of AI Tech Lead Architect
Read breakdown →
08

Event-tracker two ways

'Build an event-tracker' — an underspecified task. Two repos: UDP fire-and-forget and HTTP+PostgreSQL. The choice between them is the durability conversation.

CTO Architect Tech Lead
Read breakdown →
10

Eval as a release criterion

An AI feature passes eval and breaks in prod — because eval ran on the same inputs as the demo. Three release gate layers: regression from real incidents, distribution diff against a snapshot, human spot-check before deploy.

CTO Head of AI Tech Lead
Read breakdown →

Want this engineering standard in your team?

Architectural breakdowns, AI-assisted development with governance, building practices that hold with a single prompt — not heroics at code review.

Email me

Series format

  • • Real task, not a textbook example
  • • Working artifact: repo or video
  • • Methodology you can repeat
  • • Honest breakdown of where the artifact fails